Journal cover Journal topic
Ocean Science An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.289 IF 2.289
  • IF 5-year value: 2.756 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore value: 2.76 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 1.050 SNIP 1.050
  • IPP value: 2.65 IPP 2.65
  • SJR value: 1.554 SJR 1.554
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 41 Scimago H
    index 41
  • h5-index value: 30 h5-index 30
Discussion papers
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 20 May 2019

Research article | 20 May 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Ocean Science (OS).

Implications of different nitrogen input sources for potential production and carbon flux estimates in the coastal Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and Korean coastal waters

Jongsun Kim1, Piers Chapman1, Gilbert Rowe1,2, and Steven F. DiMarco1 Jongsun Kim et al.
  • 1Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3146, USA
  • 2Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University, Galveston, TX 77553, USA

Abstract. The coastal Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and Coastal Sea off Korea (CSK) both suffer from human-induced eutrophication. We used a N-mass balance model in two different regions with different nitrogen input sources to estimate organic carbon fluxes and predict future carbon fluxes under different model scenarios. The coastal GOM receives nitrogen predominantly from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers and atmospheric nitrogen deposition (AN-D) is only a minor component in this region. However, in the CSK, groundwater and atmospheric nitrogen deposition are more important controlling factors. Our model includes the fluxes of nitrogen to the ocean from the atmosphere, groundwater, and rivers, based on observational and literature data, and identifies three zones (brown, green and blue waters) in the coastal GOM and CSK with different productivity and carbon fluxes. Based on our model results, the potential primary production rate in the inner (brown water) zone are more than 2 (GOM) and 1.5 gC m−2 day−1 (CSK). In the middle (green water) zone, potential production is between 0.1 to 2 (GOM) and 0.3 to 1.5 gC m−2 day−1 (CSK). In the offshore (blue water) zone, productivity is less than 0.1 (GOM) and 0.3 (CSK) gC m−2 day−1. Through our model scenario results, overall oxygen demand in the GOM would increase approximately 21 % if we fail to reduce riverine N input, likely increasing considerably the area affected by hypoxia. Comparing the results from the U.S. with those from Korea shows the importance of considering both riverine and atmospheric inputs of nitrogen. This has direct implications for investigating how changes in energy technologies can lead to changes in the production of various atmospheric contaminants that affect air quality, climate and the health of local populations.

Jongsun Kim et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 22 Jul 2019)
Status: open (until 22 Jul 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Jongsun Kim et al.
Jongsun Kim et al.
Total article views: 110 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
92 14 4 110 1 1
  • HTML: 92
  • PDF: 14
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 110
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 92 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 92 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
No saved metrics found.
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Jun 2019
Publications Copernicus