Journal cover Journal topic
Ocean Science An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2018-52
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
25 Apr 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Ocean Science (OS).
An Evaluation of the Performance of Sea-Bird Scientific's Autonomous SeaFETTM: Considerations for the Broader Oceanographic Community
Cale A. Miller1,a, Katie Pocock2, Wiley Evans2, and Amanda L. Kelley1 1College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA
2Hakai Institute, Heriot Bay, BC, Canada
apresent address: Department of Evolution and Ecology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, CA, USA
Abstract. The commercially available Sea-Bird SeaFETTM provides an accessible way for a broad community of researchers to study ocean acidification and obtain robust measurements of seawater pH via the use of an in situ autonomous sensor. There are pitfalls, however, that have been detailed in previous best practices for sensor care, deployment, and data handling. Here, we took advantage of two distinctly different coastal settings to evaluate the Sea-Bird SeaFETTM and examine the multitude of scenarios in which problems may arise confounding the accuracy of measured pH. High-resolution temporal measurements of pH were obtained during 3- to 5-month field deployments in three separate locations (two in south-central, Alaska, USA, and one British Columbia, CA) spanning a broad range of nearshore temperature and salinity conditions. Both the internal and external electrodes onboard the SeaFETTM were evaluated against robust benchtop measurements for accuracy utilizing either the factory calibration, an in situ single-point calibration, or in situ multi-point calibration. In addition, two sensors deployed in parallel in Kasitsna Bay, AK, USA, were compared for inter-sensor variability in order to quantify other factors contributing to SeaFETTM intrinsic inaccuracies. Based on our results, the multi-point calibration method provided the highest accuracy (< 0.025 difference in pH) of pH when compared against benchtop measurements. Spectral analysis of time series data showed that during spring in Alaskan waters, a range of tidal frequencies dominated pH variability, while seasonal oceanographic conditions were the dominant driver in Canadian waters. Further, it is suggested that spectral analysis performed on initial deployments may be able to act as an a posteriori method to better identify appropriate calibration regimes. Based on this evaluation, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the potential sources of uncertainty associated with accuracy and precision of the SeaFETTM electrodes.
Citation: Miller, C. A., Pocock, K., Evans, W., and Kelley, A. L.: An Evaluation of the Performance of Sea-Bird Scientific's Autonomous SeaFETTM: Considerations for the Broader Oceanographic Community, Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2018-52, in review, 2018.
Cale A. Miller et al.
Cale A. Miller et al.
Cale A. Miller et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
256 51 3 310 2 3

Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 310 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 25 May 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share