Journal cover Journal topic
Ocean Science An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.289 IF 2.289
  • IF 5-year value: 2.756 IF 5-year 2.756
  • CiteScore value: 2.76 CiteScore 2.76
  • SNIP value: 1.050 SNIP 1.050
  • SJR value: 1.554 SJR 1.554
  • IPP value: 2.65 IPP 2.65
  • h5-index value: 30 h5-index 30
  • Scimago H index value: 41 Scimago H index 41
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-12-983-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-12-983-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 03 Jun 2015

Research article | 03 Jun 2015

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript for further review has not been submitted.

Regime changes in global sea surface salinity trend

A. L. Aretxabaleta1,*, K. W. Smith2, and J. Ballabrera-Poy1 A. L. Aretxabaleta et al.
  • 1Institut de Ciències del Mar – CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
  • 2Independent Research, West Tisbury, MA, USA
  • *now at: US Geological Survey and Integrated Statistics, Woods Hole, MA, USA

Abstract. Recent studies have shown significant sea surface salinity (SSS) changes at scales ranging from regional to global. In this study, we estimate global salinity means and trends using historical (1950–2014) SSS data from the UK Met. Office Hadley Centre objectively analyzed monthly fields and recent data from the SMOS satellite (2010–2014). We separate the different components (regimes) of the global surface salinity by fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model to the data and using Expectation–Maximization to distinguish the means and trends of the data. The procedure uses a non-subjective method (Bayesian Information Criterion) to extract the optimal number of means and trends. The results show the presence of three separate regimes: Regime A (1950–1990) is characterized by small trend magnitudes; Regime B (1990–2009) exhibited enhanced trends; and Regime C (2009–2014) with significantly larger trend magnitudes. The salinity differences between regime means were around 0.01. The trend acceleration could be related to an enhanced global hydrological cycle or to a change in the sampling methodology.

A. L. Aretxabaleta et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. L. Aretxabaleta et al.
A. L. Aretxabaleta et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
452 241 52 745 13 38
  • HTML: 452
  • PDF: 241
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 745
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2015)
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 18 Jan 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We estimate global surface salinity means and trends using historical (1950-2014) monthly fields and recent SMOS satellite data. We separate the regimes by fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model with a non-subjective method. There are three separate regimes: A (1950-1990) with small trends; B (1990-2009) with enhanced trends; and C (2009-2014) with significantly larger trends. The trend acceleration could be related to an enhanced hydrological cycle or to changes in sampling methodology.
We estimate global surface salinity means and trends using historical (1950-2014) monthly fields...
Citation
Share