Journal cover Journal topic
Ocean Science An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.985 IF 2.985
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 2.790 IF 5-year
    2.790
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 2.70 CiteScore
    2.70
  • SNIP value: 1.191 SNIP 1.191
  • SJR value: 1.885 SJR 1.885
  • IPP value: 2.589 IPP 2.589
  • h5-index value: 25 h5-index 25
doi:10.5194/os-2016-81
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Technical note
01 Nov 2016
Review status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Ocean Science (OS). A final paper in OS is not foreseen.
Technical Note: Volume Transport Equations in Combined Sverdrup-Stommel-Munk Dynamics without Level of no Motion
Peter C. Chu Naval Ocean Analysis and Prediction Laboratory, Department of Oceanography Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USA
Abstract. The cornerstone theories of ocean dynamics proposed by Sverdrup (1947), Stommel (1948), and Munk (1950) are based on the assumption of level of no motion. Such an assumption is the same as the assumption of no meridional geostrophic transport. Ever since Sverdrup (1947) however, verification of the accuracy of the Sverdrup balance theory is based on the comparison of the Sverdrup meridional transport with the meridional transport calculated directly from the geostrophic currents based on hydrographic data. To overcome the mismatch between theory (no meridional geostrophic transport in Sverdrup transport) and verification (comparison of Sverdrup transport to meridional geostrophic transport), extended Sverdrup-Stommel-Munk transport equations are derived in this note with replacing the level of no motion by the ocean bathymetry and in consequence one forcing function (surface wind stress) in the classical transport equations (with level of no motion assumption) is replaced by five forcing functions: density, surface wind stress, bottom meridional current, bottom stresses due to vertical and horizontal viscosities. The first two forcing functions (density and surface wind stress) are more than an order of magnitude stronger than the other three forcing functions using the world ocean bathymetry, climatological annual mean hydrographic and surface wind stress data. The extended Sverdrup volume transport streamfunctions under wind forcing, density forcing, and combined wind and density forcing are presented.

Citation: Chu, P. C.: Technical Note: Volume Transport Equations in Combined Sverdrup-Stommel-Munk Dynamics without Level of no Motion, Ocean Sci. Discuss., doi:10.5194/os-2016-81, 2016.
Peter C. Chu
Peter C. Chu

Viewed

Total article views: 147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
117 20 10 147 3 9

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 146 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 26 Mar 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
New volume transport equations are derived to remove the level of no-motion assumption. One forcing function (surface wind stress) in the classical transport equations (with level of no-motion) is replaced by five forcing functions: density, surface wind stress, bottom meridional current, bottom stresses due to vertical and horizontal viscosities. The density and surface wind stress are dominant using the world ocean bathymetry, climatological annual mean (T, S), and surface wind stress data.
New volume transport equations are derived to remove the level of no-motion assumption. One...
Share